Page 1
ANALYSIS OF ACTIONS

DATEPLACE AND TYPE OF OBJECTIVENUMBER OF CROCODILES DEPLOYEDQUANTITY OF FUEL USEDENEMY KILLED OR SHOT WHEN RUNNING ABOUT ON FIREPRISONERS OF WARQUALITY OF ENEMYREMARKS
7 JUNECHERON (Hedgerows)28 shotsNil known150Beach defence but above averageImpromptu plan. Flame caused surrender. Scratch Inf. collected
(Misc.R.A. and R.Sigs)
14 JUNESENAUDIERE (Village)2 out of 31/8 of a trailer eachNil knownNilGoodInf. over a mile behind
(50 Div.)
26 JUNENath of CHENY31/8 of a trailer eachNil known50 approx. next morningGood S.S.Mop up to get snipers out of hedgerows. P.W. came in next morning - 1 or 2 with burns
(Misc.)
26/27 JUNEST. MAUVIEU (Village)5 on 3 occasions1/2 trailer eachNil knownA few to Inf.Good S.S.Mop up to get snipers out of houses. Lack of Inf. Support Good flaming showing how houses can be burnt by Crocodiles.
(15 S. Div.)
27 JUNECHATEAU LE LANDEL (wood)31/4 trailer eachNil knownNot knownGoodFailure. Bad plan - bad tie up with Inf. Far too few Crocodiles for large objective. Good job for a Sqn. which would have saved many Inf. lives.
(3 Brit. Div.)
2 JULYRAURAY (Hedgerows)31/4 trailer each3 estimated5Good S.S.Small job. No Inf. Snipers "flushed" out.
(49 Div.)
3 JulyCARPIQUET (Trenches)4 (omits 2 small actions)1/4 trailer each25 Approx5Good S.S.A half Sqn. of Crocodiles found itself among Germans who had not run away. No Inf. in support
(3 Can.Div.)

(Archive transcripts © Copyright Normandy War Guide)

Share this

Found an error?

Found an error with this archive item? report it here!

Archive: Analysis of operational use of Churchill Crocodile flame throwers in NW Europe, June-October 1944

Page: Page 1