ANALYSIS OF ACTIONS (continued) Page 3

DATEPLACE AND TYPE OF OBJECTIVENUMBER OF CROCODILES DEPLOYEDQUANTITY OF FUEL USEDENEMY KILLED OR SHOT WHEN RUNNING ABOUT ON FIREPRISONERS OF WARQUALITY OF ENEMYREMARKS
22 JULYNOYERS (Hedgerows, wood, houses)3 on 4 occasions1/2 trailer each average in allNil knownSome to InfGood S.S.Three of these were well-planned small jobs. One was a failure, infantry did not come.
(59 Div.)
24 JULYBON REPOS (Hedgerows, House5 out of 71/2 trailer each average16About 30Good S.S.Very well-planned "shock" raid. Good artillery and tank support. Inf. followed up well. Fine flaming a big success.
(53 Div.)
31 JULYCAUMONT (wood)4 out of 71/2 trailer each averageNil known10 - 20 estimatedFairWell-planned and carried out. Little opposition in the event. Good flaming.
(15 S. Div.)
31 JULYST. GERMAIN D'ECTOT (Hedgerows, houses)3 twice1/2 trailer each average in allNil knownAbout 20FairSmall operation. Flame valuable.
(50 Div.)
? Aug.? (East of TILLEY) (Hedgerows and Ditches)4 out of 61/5 trailer each averageNil knownNil KnownGood S.S.The barrage was lost. The Inf were pinned. The tanks failed to support the Crocodiles. Disappointing.
(15 S. Div.)
8 AugMAY-SUR-ORNE (Village)9 out of 121/3 trailer each averageNil known100 approx.Good S.S.Quick simple plan. Inf. tired and disheartened - had just been driven out. Behind the Crocodiles they had no casualties and retook the town. A flame-thrower triumph. All 9 Crocodiles in line. Ideal use.
(2 Can. Div.)
8 AUGSECQUEVILLE A LA CAMPAGNE (Hedgerows, wood)91/6 trailer each averageNil known50 approxPoorGood plan. String artillery and tank support. Good Inf who followed up well. Enemy had been heavily bombed. Attack overwhelmed a weak defence.
(51st Div)

(Archive transcripts © Copyright Normandy War Guide)

Share this

Found an error?

Found an error with this archive item? report it here!

Archive: Analysis of operational use of Churchill Crocodile flame throwers in NW Europe, June-October 1944

Page: Page 3