ANALYSIS OF ACTIONS (continued) Page 5

DATEPLACE AND TYPE OF OBJECTIVENUMBER OF CROCODILES DEPLOYEDQUANTITY OF FUEL USEDENEMY KILLED OR SHOT WHEN RUNNING ABOUT ON FIREPRISONERS OF WARQUALITY OF ENEMYREMARKS
28 SEPTCAPE GRIS NEZ (Concrete defences)121/4 trailer each average1 - 51,000 (2,000 in all)PoorCrocodiles led the attack all along the front of the two attacks. When flaming started enemy surrendered in each position in turn.
(3 Can. Div.)
22/25 OCT.Approaches to HERTZOGENBOSCH from East, (Copses, hedgerows, villages)61 1/2 trailers each average used 3 times in 2 days. Also used at least twice more from 26-31 Oct10 - 20 estimated300 estimatedFairGood planning by Inf. who know how to work with Crocodiles. Good artillery and tank support. Most successful in every way.
(53 Div.)
22/25 OCT.Approaches to HERTZOGENBOSCH from South-East (Village, hedgerows)7Full trailer eachNil Known50 estimatedFairGood planning. Good co-operation with Infantry. Crocodiles well used.
(7 Armoured Div)

'B' Squadron also flamed South of SCHELDT with 9 Can. Inf. Bde. (S.D.G's) on about 19th October. (Against a village)

'A' Squadron also flamed East of HERTZOGENBOSCH on about 24th October with 51st Div. Believed successfully (Against woods.)

'C' Squadron also used flame across a canal to burn enemy out of trenches, on about 2nd November

TOTAL: - (possible 60) flame actions.


(Archive transcripts © Copyright Normandy War Guide)

Share this

Found an error?

Found an error with this archive item? report it here!

Archive: Analysis of operational use of Churchill Crocodile flame throwers in NW Europe, June-October 1944

Page: Page 5